Monday, April 07, 2008

Measurement vs Statistics

Bad Science has an interesting article about issues of measurement, before you even get to issues of analysis. Here's the first paragraph:

"There's this vague idea - which has been going around for the past few centuries - that statistics is quite difficult. But in reality the maths is often the least of your problems: the tricky bit comes way before the number crunching, when you are deciding what to measure, how to measure it, and what those measurements mean."

3 Comments:

Blogger Cusanus said...

Hi. Since you're interested in stats, please read my masterpiece, the Randomized Block Theorem by Foos - http://foossolvesunified.com
Thanks! Have a great day...

5:54 AM  
Anonymous Bryan said...

The discussion of the importance of measurement vs. the importance of stats is somewhat of a chicken-and-egg issue. Obviously, quantitative methods (especially frequentist) often have certain distributional or logical assumptions which your measurements need to meet. The value of paying due attention to measurement is that you end up with data that meets the assumptions of the analyses you intend to use.

7:39 PM  
Anonymous PTLLS Course said...

In Europe lifelong learning takes now has a different approach, we hope to see more development as a result of new legislation, good luck all teachers!

5:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home